As the most influential part of the course in my opinion was the use of lighting and how it could create a mood for the piece also developing the narrative, I felt that the interior scene scripted would be the crucial part in which we would utilise this film making technique as the environment could be heavily manipulated by use of lighting installations and camera deception. In one of the later lessons we varied the lighting setup using Dedo lights on a single character sitting at a desk, from this I gained a better understanding of how multiple lights could be used to highlight certain areas of the character to suggest a mood. In the recent lectures we also talked about how gels could be used to further the intended atmosphere which resulted in our production using a heavy amount of blue filters. In our final piece we used a total of 5 Dedo lights to light our scene involving two characters, two Dedo lamps would be designated to each of the protagonists how used in a contrasting manor for narrative benefit. The remaining Dedo lamp was suspended above the table in which the characters sat at, for this light I personally added a layer of two blue gels as I felt that the single gel didn't provide sufficient level of blue. After a conversation with the lecturer I possibly learnt the most important few crucial camera settings I should always abide to when filming, these were as follows; always shoot at 50 shutter speed, shoot only at fixed focal lengths and never go in between these solid increments when composing a shot. these settings were of course carried out in the filming of our production.
In this screen grab to the left we see the detective sitting back in the darkness of the shot, looking back at this scene I feel that he should have retained this postion throughout as it gives off a stronger sense of the characters power of Brad, his laid back attitude would have worked well to suggest his confidence that he would get away with the murder, subsequently it could connote his fear of his exposure to the light in fear (symbolically) of being ratted out. His face could have also been lit from the side much like Rachel in Blade Runner, a possible alternative.
In terms of tracking shots used within our film I felt that they were used at the right time, the choice of using a track for the long take is a perfect example of how two shots can complement one another. The lucid forward and then back tracking motion in our film through the archway serves as a driving force of the narrative as it progresses at an unnatural pace momentarily, as we see the murder take place and Brad join the scene at crossing invalls. However in the review session the audience fel that the revealing CU shot of the detective killing the drug dealer wasn't necessary, i agree in all respects as the long tracking motions aesthetic is diminished by the cut, a way of avoiding this would have been to move the killers exit route through the archway so that his identity could be revealed through the same shot rather than breaking the motion.
The
POV shots used in our film were shot using a fisheye lens, initially
the suggestion of using the lens sounded a viable choice to shoot the
POV shots however watching the footage back I retract my positive
view on the lens, I feel that its use in our film ruins the overall
aesthetic which has comprised of tracks and static shots which
together provide a clean cut film image. Avoiding the use of the lens
to shoot the POV's we could have shot them from an outsiders
perspective another possible witness to the murder case, these shots
could have been taken from a distance or we possibly could have
introduced these POV's as a false perspective, seem from an
uncredited eye.
As
a group for this project we all worked well together and everyone put
in effort in constructing the film. From the initial stages we
divided the scenes of the film up so that everyone could storyboard a
scene or part of a scene, we would then post these on the facebook so
that any conflicting ideas towards a shared scene could be resolved.